Skip to main content

What this proposed ballot measure 2F means at a glance:

  • Cost: 60¢ more for every $100 spent on purchases subject to the tax, excluding grocery food purchases
  • Revenue: is estimated to generate approximately $20 million in its first year
  • If residents vote yes: The 0.6% sales and use tax increase would take effect, creating an additional source of funding for the community capital improvement projects identified in the ballot measure.
  • If residents vote no: The 0.6% sales and use tax increase would not take effect, and the City would not receive the additional revenue proposed through the measure. 

Capital improvement projects, or CIPs, help the City maintain and improve important public infrastructure. This includes buildings, trails, outdoor spaces, and other public assets. These projects are usually paid for through the City budget, grants, and other dedicated funds.

When funding is limited, the City may need to delay new projects or put off maintenance and repairs on existing infrastructure. This can make it hard to meet current needs while planning for future improvements. Over time, delayed maintenance can lead to more damage, higher repair costs, and possible safety risks.

Additional funding from the proposed sales tax increase would help the City move forward with new projects and address deferred maintenance needs.

Here are the projects the sales tax increase would fund 

What Your Vote Means on 2F

A YES vote means:

  • Approval of a 0.6% sales and use tax increase, excluding grocery purchases.
  • The City estimates this tax will generate about $20 million in its first year, but actual revenue will depend on taxable sales.
  • It provides dedicated funding for existing financial obligations of approximately $100 million from prior investments, helping to preserve existing City revenues for parks, recreation, and maintenance. 

A NO vote means:

  • Opposing the 0.6% sales and use tax increase.
  • There is no guarantee on how funds will be allocated, potentially prioritizing larger capital projects over essential community needs such as parks and recreational facilities.
  • It avoids the potential long-term commitment of higher sales taxes, which could remain until 2067, impacting families already facing rising costs.
     

Frequently Asked Questions